Talk:Master of Marketing Research

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Marketing & Advertising Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Complaint

Reads like a dictionary entry. See wp:not Brian 13:05, 1 July 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

Doesn't mean it can be expanded. I deflagged this because this doesn't fulfill criteria for speedy deletion at all; it's wayyy too detailed to be considered "empty", and has enough context for people to figure out what it's about. PROD this or take it to AfD if you disagree. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 20:45, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MMR

Well, I mildly object to wwwolf's tone here --- the at all seems a little over the top. There certainly wasn't enough context for me and I don't see this as very detailed let alone "wayyy too detailed". OTH, I didn't do enough research myself and I do find that this is a legitimate degree (still reads like a dictionary article, so I still think it fits wp:not), and I see where it links in to very legitimate articles. So, I'm not going to PROD or AfD. I will tag it for expansion though as I don't think that, as written, it's a good Wikipedia article. So, on balance, I agree the CSD was hasty (I've been looking at a lot of new and recent change pages) but I also think that Wwwwolf has a bit more of a bite than a growl :-) Brian 22:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)Btball[reply]

few links, no category, no sources, little context

This article appears valid (as I said above after being bitten by the wolf <smile>) but it really doesn't stand well by itself. I never heard of this degree - and expect that it is unique to the United States. A little more context would help, at least me :-) How many schools offer this degree? Is it US only or do other systems offer it? When was it first offered? etc. A few sources would help and a few more links to the article would help. Thanks, Brian 22:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)btball[reply]

Hope this improves the article

I've been working on the article for the past couple of hours.

It is a somewhat North America specific degree.

Elwood64151 20:59, 5 July 2006 (UTC)Elwood64151[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Master of Marketing Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150912111334/http://www.siue.edu/business/mmr/alumni_profiles.shtml to http://www.siue.edu/business/mmr/alumni_profiles.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]