Talk:Massey Poyntz

Massey Poyntz has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 15, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Cricket: Europe cricket / Somerset Low‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Europe cricket task force. New participants are always welcome!

This article is within the scope of the Somerset County Cricket Club task force, a task force which is currently considered to be inactive.

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Massey Poyntz/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sahara4u (talk · contribs) 11:33, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lede

Any image for the lede?

Unfortunately not at the moment. There is nothing online, and although I do have a photo of him in a book, I can't get a decent scan of it at the moment. I intend to get one eventually though! Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

“….was an English cricketer” → “was an English First-class cricketer” or simply “First-class cricketer”

Added first-class. Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Link right-handed batsman

Linked batsman to Batting (cricket). Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

“.…….against Cambridge University in 1919.” “the” before Cambridge University, since you have linked it to cricket club. There may be others…..

I disagree, that would make the sentence grammatically poor. Although it is linked to the cricket club, the way the sentence itself is phrased is perfectly acceptable. Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please rephrase the last sentence of the 2nd para?

I can, but could you clarify what your problem with it is? Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Last two sentences start with "After ...ing". It would be better if you avoid to repeat the same. Zia Khan 15:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tweaked it. How's that? Harrias ^talk 15:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now. Zia Khan 16:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Early life and career

“…followed his older brother Hugh into the Somerset side.[6]” → could you mention his full name?

As in "Hugh Poyntz", or "Hugh Stainton Poyntz"? I don't really see the need in either case: he only had one brother named Hugh, so there is no need to include the middle name to disambiguate, and I have linked to his article anyway. It is reasonable to assume that he will have the same surname, so including that is superfluous. Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

County captain

“……scoring 50 runs exactly in the second innings of a match against Middlesex at Bath.[16]” No need of “exactly” and put “the” before Bath.

Removed "exactly", but given that Bath is a city, it would be grammatically incorrect to put "the" before it. Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

“…against Hampshire at Bath.[20]” Same as above

As above. Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A link to “bowling average”

Linked. Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

“….and he scored three half-centuries.” → “and scored three half-centuries.”

Removed "he". Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wartime career and later life

“..Poyntz was appointed to the 3rd Battalion, Bedfordshire Regiment.[29] → “third”, same for the 2nd in the next sentence

Military units are always referred to in this format: see Category:Battalions of the British Army. Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

“averaging 10.00 from his three innings.” → no need of “his”

Removed "his". Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, the article looks good and informative. I'll take another look once the above concerns addressed. Zia Khan 11:33, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review: I have responded to your comments, and look forward to any further points you might have. Harrias ^talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Final review

GA review (see Wikipedia:Good article criteria and WP:GACN)

Well written.
a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction:
Factually accurate and verifiable.
a (well-referenced): b (citations to reliable sources): c (Wikipedia:No original research):
Broad in its coverage.
a (covers major aspects): b (well-focused):
Neutral .
Fair representation, no bias:
Stable.
No edit wars nor disputed contents:
Illustrated appropriately by images.
No image
Conclusion: Good work with the article, passes GA criteria. Zia Khan 16:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Pass/Fail: