Talk:Mass spectral interpretation

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Yinhuanxie. Peer reviewers: Yilim.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:35, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

degraded article

This article has expanded but at the same time degraded. Deleted content:

natural abundance table
the toluene example: this is what the analysis is all about!
mention of single-headed arrow

It is really not my job to find out what content went missing, it is the responsibility of any editor to preserve content or delete it with justification V8rik (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I rolled it back to this version: [1]. I will have my student go back to the sandbox version and then make another attempt at article expansion. Thanks! --Kkmurray (talk) 19:39, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your consideration V8rik (talk) 17:41, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry for deleting all the other contents. It's my first time to edit Wikipedia page. I just try to paste my stuff on my main page. I don't know it will cause such trouble. I revised it again. And I posted my own idea about fragmentation patterns of specific organic functional group and some basic assumption about fragmentation and keep other stuff at the same time. Hope it's OK. If you have any question, let me know, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinhuanxie (talk • contribs) 00:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for the work you put into the article, I have moved the natural abundance table to natural abundance (if the physicists allow it...) V8rik (talk) 09:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was assigned to review this article and I checked the criteria for B-class status. Referencing and citation are not meet: most of reference of this article are secondary summary journal and books which are great. But the Electron ionization section are all based on Pavia's book, and the Fragmentation section are all based on Dass's book, I think more citations are needed for those two sections. Structure is not met: The Electron ionization section includes several paragraphs that may not be appropriate. For example the isotope distribution paragraph can be moved to the Rules section. I suggest to keep the Electron ionization section simple, and divide this section into more sub-titles. The Rules sections describes the rules to find the molecular formula, but not the rules used to identify the organic structure of fragments. I suggest move the Rules section before the Fragmentation section, and also change its title.Yilim (talk) 01:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just a suggestion, why don't we add the neutral loss table? Yilim (talk) 15:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC) Thanks. Yilim. Your suggestions are wonderful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yinhuanxie (talk • contribs) 19:50, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Molecular ion" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Molecular ion. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 8#Molecular ion until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jay ^(Talk) 11:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]