Jump to content

Talk:Masahiko Kimura

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Too much of the text of this article appears to be lifted from: http://www.bjj.org/interviews/kimura/. I've rewritten some of it, but it could use some more by whoever's willing and able to do so. Cla68

Holy Copyright Infringement, Batman! Looks like a pretty clear issue of directly copying the text from an outside web page and pasteing it directly to here. What's really sad is that the person didn't even bother to alter the rest of the article, which includes much of the information in the text that was stolen. Article doesn't need to be deleted, though. Just revert to the last version by Bobblewik. Problem solved. Tuckdogg 15:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Temp page created from Bobblewik's last, just to be safe. Tuckdogg 16:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Olympics

[edit]

I was wondering why Kimura never competed at the Olympic games? Portillo (talk) 08:31, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would guess it's because they didn't have judo as an event until 1964, and he might not have been eligible by then because of his professional wrestling. He'd also be pretty old by that stage. 93.107.220.100 (talk) 09:19, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citation on Broken Gracie Bones

[edit]

A citation is badly needed regarding the supposed breaking of Gracie's bones in that match. He was very flexible, a dislocation I do believe applies, but it IS WIDELY REPORTED ELSEWHERE that no bones were broken (due to Gracie's flexibility). Kimura stated they broke in an interview, but that's not evidence of a fact. The writer should look into this, since it is clearly stated on Gracie's wikipage that no bones were broken. What's the true story? It matters: it is a famous and very important match in Judo history, sport history even. Thanks for reading this! :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.123.97.125 (talk) 20:53, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Was he in the Japanese military during WWII?

[edit]

yes or no? 184.96.254.177 (talk) 10:38, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Masahiko Kimura. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:30, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Masahiko Kimura. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]