Talk:Masa Saito/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi. I am reviewing your article Masa Saito for GA. I have read through it and have a couple of comments.
- There is a dead link that I commented out: http://www.otherarena.com/htm/cgi-bin/biography.cgi?kenpater
- In "Finishing and signature moves", why are some of the entries bolded and some are not?
- I feel there are too many short sections, containing only a few sentences.
- Other than describing his wrestling career in the form of the championships he won etc. there is very little sense of his character as a wrestler, his training, his motivation etc.
- The brief section "Battery", other than saying that he was sent to prison, there is no mention of the impact of such an event on his life or his career.
- There is nothing about his personal life. Normally, I am not a stickler for this, but in the absence of any personal information at all, something is needed in this article to bring the article subject to life.
- The writing style is very dry and nothing stands out about this person for the average reader.
—Mattisse (Talk) 02:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): The prose is grammatically correct, but very dry and uninteresting. b (MoS): No MoS errors noted
- a (prose): The prose is grammatically correct, but very dry and uninteresting. b (MoS): No MoS errors noted
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): The article is well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): No original research
- a (references): The article is well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable c (OR): No original research
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): The article does not set the subject in sufficient context for the general reader b (focused): It is too focused and does not contain sufficient information on the subject to be interesting
- a (major aspects): The article does not set the subject in sufficient context for the general reader b (focused): It is too focused and does not contain sufficient information on the subject to be interesting
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- Fair representation without bias: NPOV
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I am sorry to fail this article. Normally your articles are very good. Perhaps there just is not enough information available on Masa Saito to provide for a GA. You may, of course, resubmit the article at GAN or list it at GAR. —Mattisse (Talk) 02:04, 11 January 2009 (UTC)