Talk:Maryland Route 331

Maryland Route 331 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 6, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Maryland Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Maryland

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the Maryland Roads portal in June 2013.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 331/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Starting GA review. Jezhotwells (talk) 03:12, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail criteria assessment

The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.

No problems with quick fail criteria. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
\i made some copy-edits to improve the grammar.
b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
It is broad in its scope.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
tagged and licensed
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
A good clean article. Congratulations. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]