Talk:Maryland Route 228

Maryland Route 228 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 22, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Maryland Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Maryland

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the Maryland Roads portal in February 2013.

Merging Berry Road

The article for Berry Road should be merged into MD 228 because it is short and it basically describes the same road. Dough4872 (talk) 17:07, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merged - Berry Road is a redirect now. I thought the "Berry" name applied only to the Charles portion, but I re-checked the PG 2006 HLR and noticed they list the name there too. Kumba42 (talk) 21:41, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 228/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: --P C B 01:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
There are a few prose issues, listed below.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
Nice job how you completely did the article in only four edits.
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I will put the article on hold for the few prose issues I have.

What project? (lead)
- I rewrote the last two sentences of the Lead to remove the ambiguity. V C 03:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The description of lanes in the route description is pretty confusing. I don't have many suggestions for rewording, but I suggest that you reword it somehow.
- Can you be more specific about what confuses you? V C 03:44, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Never mind that. I read it over again and again and can't find any better way to say it. The article is a pass. --P C B 04:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are several overlinking instances, such as the continuous-flow interchange and MD 210.
- Both items are linked twice: once in the prose and once in the caption of the photo, which is MOS-compliant. V C 03:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you specify what Piney Branch is?
- I added a clause that Piney Branch is a tributary of Mattawoman Creek. V C 03:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a repeating pattern in the first paragraph of the history. "A BLA was BLAHed to/in BLAH in YEAR." Maybe you should mix this up a little.
- There is sufficient variety in how I phrase the content of that paragraph. It is not like I am using the same words in every sentence. V C 03:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you get a little more information about 228A? History if possible? Maybe a little more about the route?--P C B 01:50, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have a general idea of when MD 228A was built or assigned, but I am unable to support it with concrete sources. The road is a very short state-maintained section of a county highway that is not notable. V C 03:26, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]