Jump to content

Talk:Marxian class theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Duplication?

[edit]

This page seems to overlap a lot with the section on Marxism in the Social Class article. Is there any reason to have both? And, if not, which should stay? VoluntarySlave (talk) 06:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely agree with merging the articles. —Zcbeaton (talk) 12:26, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marxian class theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:33, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Last part of 'Proletarianisation'

[edit]

Should the section on 'Proletarianisation' be edited as to remove the last part, which talks about "in the rich countries of the 'first world.'"? Ignoring the use of the 'first world' to describe a country's global position through a Marxist lens, this is no longer true as countries classified as being inside the 'second' or 'third' worlds, such as China or Nigeria, have themselves large numbers of wage labourers, i.e. proletarians. The citation for the Section is fine, as Capital does indeed describe the process of Proletarianisation, but few Marxists do not acknowledge industrial shift and Proletarianisation in all countries, not just the wealthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mojotjejen (talkcontribs) 22:30, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marxian vs Marxists

[edit]

It would seem sensible to establish the distinction between "Marxian" and "Marxist" somewhere. Bearing in mind the distinctions established by various prominent writers (e.g. Oliver Cox, Paul Mattick, we may not want to cover this in too much detail on this card, but rather enable readers access a more detailed discussion on a dedicated page.Leutha (talk) 11:55, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]