Jump to content

Talk:Marvin Gaye (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleMarvin Gaye (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Featured topic starMarvin Gaye (song) is part of the Meghan Trainor's Billboard Hot 100 entries series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 21, 2020Good article nomineeListed
October 17, 2023Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marvin Gaye (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marvin Gaye (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:24, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception

[edit]

I think there should be a section that talks about the song's critical reception. Fladoodle (talk) 21:28, 23 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done.--NØ 14:49, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Marvin Gaye (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey MaranoFan, I'll review this. LOVI33 15:17, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing this article, LOVI33. Looking forward to it!--NØ 15:32, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Sourced to Tidal now.
  • Is the 2014 recording year sourced?
  • Are you sure Soul should be included as a genre since it refers to solely to its references?
  • One of the critics stated it has a "modernized throwback soul sound".
  • Per Template:Infobox song, later releases should be included in the article, not infobox so remove Atlantic records.
  • Isn't this Puth's debut single? If so you should add something about that in the opening sentence.
  • Target music critics to Music journalism

Background and release

[edit]

Composition

[edit]

Critical reception

[edit]

Chart performance

[edit]

North America

[edit]
  • Looks good!

Oceania and Europe

[edit]

Music video

[edit]
  • Looks Good!

Live performances

[edit]
  • Looks Good!

Track listing

[edit]
  • Looks Good!

Credits and personnel

[edit]

Charts

[edit]
  • Weekly charts says 2014–15 but wasn't it released in 2015?

Certifications

[edit]
  • Looks Good!

Release history

[edit]
  • Remove streaming, sources are from iTunes.

References

[edit]
  • Make sure all of these are archived.
  • Copyvio score needs work at 43.2%. Fix your quoting from ref 3
  • Change publisher to BBC for ref 8
  • Remove target to Entertainment Weekly on ref 19
  • Ref 51 is missing a website or publisher.
  • Ref 56: "jeff" → "Jeff"
[edit]
  • Looks Good!

Final comments and verdict

[edit]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.