Talk:Martin Flood

This article was nominated for deletion on 2/6/2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Australia: Television Start‑class

	Australia portal Martin Flood is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Untitled

This article seems to contradict itself...it states that at one point, Martin used a Lifeline to get the Audience's opinion, however it follows that up with "Eddie and the audience marvelled in amazement as he secured himself $250,000, still without using a lifeline". I don't watch the show, so I can't correct it personally, but the sooner someone fixes this article up, the better. TheZaniak 11:58, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello 211.30.18.73: Please explain why you chose, without discussion, to delete the entire section on the news events surrounding Flood's win. This was significant news at the time and is part of the story of his win. Grimhim 21:09, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll start working through this; the article appears to have been written by someone either in Channel 9's publicity department or, more likely, a mate of Martin Flood's. A very close mate. It's time for this "enigmatic magic" and "marvelled in amazement" froth to disappear.Grimhim 03:19, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the $64,000 question: Does anyone know what the $64,000 question was? Grimhim 04:42, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The original article appears to be a copy from the millionaire.ninemsn webpage which was written by someone in Channel 9's publicity department. Email me at quizshowjunky at hotmail and I will explain why I removed your text. No offence was intended. Quizshowjunky 04:03, 31 January 2006 (GMT)

Removed the additional section. I'll come back to that when I have additional information.Grimhim 05:25, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

I propose to delete the cleanup tag from this entry. The initial PR-written text has been reduced to a more objective description.Grimhim 02:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The cleanup that took place today was too harsh. The article needs the list of questions and the correct answers. Grimhim 04:25, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And what's the justification for the inclusion? I removed it under WP:NOT#IINFO. Recurring dreams 06:52, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The justification? A guy wins a million dollars for answering a handful of trivia questions, so it's worth preserving for posterity what trivia he was able to answer correctly. Wikipedia's own definition is that it's a written compendium aiming to convey information. The WP:NOT#IINFO you cite applies to irrelevant (lengthy) detail and statistics; the short list of questions here wouldn't conflict with that. Grimhim 07:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The policy point 7, which refers to plot summaries, best covers this issue. Also, a person's notability does not necessitate recounting the event for which he/she is notable in fine detail.Recurring dreams 08:28, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Point 7, which deals with the plot summaries of works of fiction, has little bearing on what we're discussing here: a list of a dozen or so questions that were answered correctly for a million dollars. This is not "fine detail". It is an interesting and relevant fact that explains how this man came to be one of the small number of million-dollar winners on this show. Reinstating those questions will not detract from the article. Grimhim 08:42, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having said all that, I note that the entries for the US and UK winners don't list their questions. The UK winner does, however, name the million dollar question. Flood's article should contain that, at least. Grimhim 09:33, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's a fair compromise. Recurring dreams 12:08, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Martin Flood Million.jpg

Image:Martin Flood Million.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Martin Flood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070909174302/http://www.money.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=100347 to http://money.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=100347

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:50, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]