This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Perhaps somebody could add some more sections/ material, so this poor guy's page has some other content than the domestic incident?
I'll ask somebody else to do this, since I'm not a follower of sports broadcasting or Martin, & not particularly informed in this area.
Thanks. Twhitmore.nz (talk) 01:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So when are we allowed to mention his arrest on 29 December? I don't understand how this works... Since when does New Zealand law have jurisdiction in the US?? I mean there's no link to the fact he went to St Patrick's College, but that's been left there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.218.222.248 (talk) 04:14, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Controversial material must be reliably sourced. His alma mater could be challenged for being unsourced, but that's relatively benign. However, there are some categories of assertions that are negative enough that they must be sourced—arrests, breakups, assault incidents, marital indiscretions, or anything else negative (or potentially defamatory). Unless you can point to a reliable source that backs up your assertion that he was arrested, it can't go in the article. If New Zealand's gag order has kept it out of all reliable newspapers and the like, then no, it can't go in the article. —C.Fred (talk) 04:19, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
