This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Sure, but the cladogram is strange in the fact that sea spiders (among other non-marrellomorphs) are nested within the group in this analysis. These should be clearly labelled to denote that they are usually not considered marrelomorphs. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:43, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, but Marrellomorpha, Marrellida, Acercostraca, and the taxa Aquilionifer, Haliestes, and Palaeoisopus which are nested within Marellomorpha in this analysis but usually are not considered marrellomorphs, should be clearly labelled.ohs Hemiauchenia (talk) 08:28, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Iezer: Your drawings looks really great. Would it be possible to create a drawing of Skania fragilis based on the restoration in Legg 2015? The original restoration was created in 2010, before the redescription. Hemiauchenia (talk) 19:26, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I was only expecting a simplified diagram, but you've really done a good job interpreting the morphology from the oblique perspective of the original diagram, which must not have been trivial. Hemiauchenia (talk) 15:26, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
