Talk:Market liberalism

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Libertarianism portal Market liberalism is within the scope of WikiProject Libertarianism, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Libertarianism and related subjects in the Wikipedia. Template Usage • Change Patrol • Articles Requested • Become a Member • Project Talk LibertarianismWikipedia:WikiProject LibertarianismTemplate:WikiProject LibertarianismLibertarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Redirect?

Should this page not be redirected to classical liberalism. The article essentially says that the term is used a different term for this. I mean that is redirect-material. C mon (talk) 19:10, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I personally agree with C mon. But what about redirecting to economic liberalism? --Checco (talk) 21:55, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing problem

The one source this article uses to back up its definition is the Cato institute, a libertarian think tank. A quick google search turns up a somewhat alternative definition which states that market liberalism is an alternative to classic liberalism. Needs more research. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.75.97.75 (talk) 19:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. This should redirect to classical liberalism. AlexanderLevian (talk) 11:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Market liberalism/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article states: "Like all liberals, market liberals believe in individual freedom as a central concept."

There are in fact two statements presented in that one sentence: (1) "Market liberals believe in individual freedom as a central concept." (2) "All liberals believe in individual freedom as a central concept."

That second statement is very much debatable, and shouldn't be coat-tailed in with that main point regarding "Market liberalism".

For example, the Market liberal is right here said to advocate "a small state", yet many modern liberals advocate very large state programs. Now, as the state directed society consumes taxes and grows large, the number of our individual directed life-choices must concomitantly whither.

I suggest the first statement (1) is fine, but (2) is an unnecessary inclusion of an unsupported belief belonging to the article's author.

Tomesteader (talk) 22:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 22:41, 24 August 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 23:15, 29 April 2016 (UTC)