Talk:Mark Peterson-Perez
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Reddogsix, please stop deleting every section in the article
[edit]Reddogsix, please stop [deleting every section in the article during construction for your reason that the information was already in the lede. The lede is supposed to summarize the article body, so repititions of material is supposed to happen, the opposite of your deletion basis. PPdd (talk) 19:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Why was reference removed?
[edit]Why was this reference removed with edit summary that it does not support the text? PPdd (talk) 07:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- Because no where in the report is Peterson-Perez mentioned.reddogsix (talk) 17:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
PROD
[edit]Per "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason", I am taking down the PROD tag put up with this concern - "concern=Minor activist lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Fails WP:BIO." 1. "Minor activist" is unquantified and not supported by any source. 2. The mainstream local Palo Alto press "lacking substance" is unquantified and is not a required criterion in any cited policy or guidleline. 3. No reliable source supports that the assorted Polo Alto press stories lacks substance. 4. GHits of a specific number is not a necessary ctiteron in any cited policy or guideline. PPdd (talk) 07:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- None of this addresses the statement that the individual does not meet WP:BIO or any other notability criteria. reddogsix (talk) 16:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
Reddogsix, please do not remove my construction tag again
[edit]Reddogsix, please do not remove my construction tag again. You removed it becauase I did not make an edit you considered to be of substnace for 37 hours. That is not appropriate. Please stop. PPdd (talk) 18:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Reddogsix, please undo you reference style change
[edit]Reddogsix, please undo you reference style change. Per MOS - "Where more than one style is acceptable, editors should not change an article from one of those styles to another without a substantial reason... defer to the style used by the first major contributor." You did an AfD on this article, and your repeated deletions and style changes are wasting my time. Please stop. PPdd (talk) 19:21, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Reddogsix, please restore all content you deleted while construction tags were up, especially during AfD
[edit]Reddogsix, please restore all content you deleted while construction tags were up. Thanks. PPdd (talk) 19:26, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Reddogsix, please do not remove redlinks while construction tags are up
[edit]Reddogsix, please do not remove redlinks while construction tags are up. I was planning on starting articles regarding the redlinks. Please respect the constructon tag. Thanks. PPdd (talk) 19:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)