Jump to content

Talk:Mark Field

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Unsourced controversial statement removed

[edit]

I removed the following unsourced material from the 'Personal Life' section, due to concerns about violating WP:BLP. If you can find a reliable source, feel free to add it back to the article: "His first marriage to Michele Acton, a former director of Hong Kong Shanghai Investment Bank ended in divorce in 2006 subsequent to revelations of Field's adultery with Conservative Party candidate Elizabeth Truss." Terraxos 14:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The relevant source is The Times, Tuesday October 27th 2009, p5, although I don't know how to reference that properly. The story may be online. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.25.106.209 (talk) 16:31, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Mark Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:17, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mark Field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Affair with Liz Truss

[edit]

Should his BLP mention his affair with Liz Truss, which attracted a lot of attention and led to the divorce of his first marraige (he has since re-married).? 78.19.224.254 (talk) 01:35, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The section on Elizabeth Truss needs to be expanded.

[edit]

The section on Elizabeth Truss needs to be expanded. 88.97.108.45 (talk) 09:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no section, and I think it is odd that such a public event - there was lots of coverage - is not represented in his BLP? 78.19.224.254 (talk) 10:19, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I believe references to the affair have been added and removed periodically. Interesting that the first of these was added by user:Philip Cross in 2010. Shtove (talk) 07:44, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have added a sentence on this. I don't think it should be over-elaborated, but it was a notable incident that received reasonable public coverage. 78.19.224.254 (talk) 13:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]