Talk:MarkLogic
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MarkLogic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 18 April 2013. The result of the discussion was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
healthcare.gov
[edit]Here's a good defense of MarkLogic on Slashdot by a programmer who was familiar with it. Now if we could find a WP:RS to say the same thing, that would make a good WP:NPOV section about MarkLogic's role in healthcare.gov.
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4480323&cid=45507161
Re: follow the money (Score:5, Insightful)
by MyDixieWrecked (548719) Alter Relationship on Sunday November 24, 2013 @11:07AM (#45507161)
I used marklogic when I worked at a previous job and after learning how it worked and understanding it better, it made our jobs incredibly easy. It just had a serious learning curve.
Marklogic is a nosql db, that uses XML for its object format and xquery for its query language. This thing is NOT mongodb. It actually works really well and allows for complex data modeling with the ability to do joins and have transactional isolation in making changes to the data as well as a really solid content processing framework with pipelining and all that jazz.
Now, I can't imagine a reason for using marklogic, or any non-relational db for a project like this. The only clue is that marklogic has a lot of government contracts; mostly for the military. So maybe that's why it was used. But the fact that they chose a database system that they weren't experts in for a project that had so much visibility speaks volumes on how mismanaged this whole project was.
--Nbauman (talk) 23:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
This article still reads like an advert
[edit]Please stop removing the advert template just because you work for / are paid as a copywriter for MarkLogic. I've made several edits (wasn't logged in, apologies) to remove some of the worst offenders. Wikipedia is not for your press releases. I have no doubt that the product is notable, but a few of the references provided just suck.
UK subsidiary
[edit]The UK Subsidiary "MARKLOGIC (UK) LIMITED" is a known affiliate of SDG REGISTRARS LIMITED & SDG SECRETARIES LIMITED, shell companies for the SCL Group. Should this be included somewhere on the page? sourcing: https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/06080277/officers SCL_Group
2601:1C0:4601:6419:8098:82B0:D503:9586 (talk) 15:38, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Additional context for History section
[edit] | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The request was not specific enough. |
In 2009 IDC mentioned MarkLogic in a report as one of the top Innovative Information Access Companies with under $100 million in revenue. That same year the term NoSQL picked up steam as a description of a database providing a mechanism for storing and retrieving data that is modeled in means other than the tabular relations used in a relational database (e.g. key-value, wide column, graph, and/or document).[1][2]
NoSQL providers posted revenue of $20 million in 2011 with projections for rapid growth.[3] MarkLogic would have fallen under that category even from its earliest years, and today, this remains a category in which MarkLogic fits.[4] The even newer term and category of “Multi-model” describes MarkLogic, too, given MarkLogic’s ability to store and query documents, graph data, or relational data from a single database.[5] PImbres (talk) 17:10, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ "The NoSQL Movement" (PDF). Journal of Computer Engineering. Retrieved 1 Nov 2016.
- ^ "No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam". Computerworld. Retrieved 1 July 2009.
- ^ "451 Research delivers market sizing estimates for NoSQL, NewSQL and MySQL ecosystem". The 451 Group. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- ^ "Couchbase Names a Leader". Couchbase. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
- ^ "Top 7 Multi-Model Databases". Pat Research. Retrieved 1 July 2017.
Reply 17-JAN-2020
[edit]
Specification requested
- It is not known what changes are requested to be made, specifically, if the text above is to be added (and if it is, where) or removed. Please state your desired changes in the form of "Change x to y using z".
Change x to y using z
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Whether the text in the edit request is proposed additions or deletions should be clarified. Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed.
Regards, Spintendo 03:43, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Make changes to reflect acquisition by Progress Software
[edit] | An impartial editor has reviewed the proposed edit(s) and asked the editor with a conflict of interest to go ahead and make the suggested changes. |
- Add an Owner field in the gray box on the right and list "Progress Software" as owner.
- End the first paragraph with "In February 2023, MarkLogic was acquired by Progress for $355 Million."
- The acquisition has been noted on the Progress Software page already.
- [1]
- Yogesh Gupta (January 3, 2023). "Progress to Acquire NoSQL Database Pioneer, MarkLogic". Progress. Retrieved January 20, 2023.
TorryC (talk) 16:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
References
Go ahead: I have reviewed these proposed changes and suggest that you go ahead and make the proposed changes to the page. Actualcpscm (talk) 16:18, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you. TorryC (talk) 13:34, 1 May 2023 (UTC)