Jump to content

Talk:Marion Richardson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Influence of Cižek[edit]

An online text mentions that Richardson, on par with Reginald Robert Tomlinson, was propagating Franz Cižek's ideas in the London County Council. Are there any reliable sources for this point?

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marion Richardson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:22, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Script[edit]

I went first to the Wikipedia 'Cursive' article where samples of various writing styles are shown but I could see no mention of Marion Richardson - I think it would be nice if someone with editing skills could put in a link to this article. Also though, (and perhaps before that) no samples of her eponymous writing style are shown here & that seems to me to be a significant omission? Perhaps even needs an article in its own right? 86.159.122.236 (talk) 17:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]