Jump to content

Talk:Marilyn Gladu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marilyn Gladu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Marilyn Gladu page edits

[edit]


  • What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}): {{textdiff}} Please add "Subsequently, the American Journal of medicine confirmed that the treatment was effective The American Journal of Medicine Now Recommends HCQ for COVID19 | Principia Scientific Intl. (principia-scientific.com) to the end of the sixth paragraph of Marilyn Gladu's page's "career" section.
  • Why it should be changed: The American Journal of Medicine did eventually change its recommendations to include HCQ as a treatment for COVID-19.
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): https://principia-scientific.com/the-american-journal-of-medicine-now-recommends-hcq-for-covid19/

Q2893471 (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would strongly oppose adding this line. I took the time to read the article cited by Principia Scientific International, which is McCullough et. al's "Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection" from the American Journal of Medicine in 2021. It is a review paper and does not make any recommendations on medical treatments for COVID-19. Review papers synthesize previous findings and publish them as alternatives to consider during clinical trials in the future. Basing health decisions on a review paper is irresponsible at best and fatal at worst. Further, Principia Scientific International is a pseudo-scientific lobby group from the UK that originally focused on climate change denialism. It is not a legitimate or peer-recognized body, as evidenced by their lack of understanding of what a "review paper" is. Adding this line would amount to retroactively validating the reactionary comments of an uninformed politician. HamOntPoliFiend (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this input, I accept your conclusion. Q2893471 (talk) 23:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

References