Talk:Marilyn Gladu
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Marilyn Gladu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304045200/http://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=can&dir=cand%2Fcanlim&document=index&lang=e to http://www.elections.ca/content2.aspx?section=can&dir=cand%2Fcanlim&document=index&lang=e
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Marilyn Gladu page edits
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
- What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}): {{textdiff}} Please add "Subsequently, the American Journal of medicine confirmed that the treatment was effective The American Journal of Medicine Now Recommends HCQ for COVID19 | Principia Scientific Intl. (principia-scientific.com) to the end of the sixth paragraph of Marilyn Gladu's page's "career" section.
- Why it should be changed: The American Journal of Medicine did eventually change its recommendations to include HCQ as a treatment for COVID-19.
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): https://principia-scientific.com/the-american-journal-of-medicine-now-recommends-hcq-for-covid19/
Q2893471 (talk) 19:21, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- I would strongly oppose adding this line. I took the time to read the article cited by Principia Scientific International, which is McCullough et. al's "Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection" from the American Journal of Medicine in 2021. It is a review paper and does not make any recommendations on medical treatments for COVID-19. Review papers synthesize previous findings and publish them as alternatives to consider during clinical trials in the future. Basing health decisions on a review paper is irresponsible at best and fatal at worst. Further, Principia Scientific International is a pseudo-scientific lobby group from the UK that originally focused on climate change denialism. It is not a legitimate or peer-recognized body, as evidenced by their lack of understanding of what a "review paper" is. Adding this line would amount to retroactively validating the reactionary comments of an uninformed politician. HamOntPoliFiend (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for this input, I accept your conclusion. Q2893471 (talk) 23:54, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
- I would strongly oppose adding this line. I took the time to read the article cited by Principia Scientific International, which is McCullough et. al's "Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection" from the American Journal of Medicine in 2021. It is a review paper and does not make any recommendations on medical treatments for COVID-19. Review papers synthesize previous findings and publish them as alternatives to consider during clinical trials in the future. Basing health decisions on a review paper is irresponsible at best and fatal at worst. Further, Principia Scientific International is a pseudo-scientific lobby group from the UK that originally focused on climate change denialism. It is not a legitimate or peer-recognized body, as evidenced by their lack of understanding of what a "review paper" is. Adding this line would amount to retroactively validating the reactionary comments of an uninformed politician. HamOntPoliFiend (talk) 20:48, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
References
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- Active politicians
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (politics and government) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (politics and government) articles
- Politics and government work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Ontario articles
- Low-importance Ontario articles
- Start-Class Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- Low-importance Political parties and politicians in Canada articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles