Jump to content

Talk:Mariage d'amour

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I see Mariage D'amour in an album in 1979， so maybe it is not created in 1987 and first performed in 1994. https://www.discogs.com/Richard-Clayderman-Lettre-A-Ma-M%C3%A8re/master/156106

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mariage d'amour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

and what about the real spring waltz?

[edit]

Is there a (real) spring waltz written by Chopin which is something completely different or doesn't it exist at all? —84.147.106.84 (17:02, 25 July 2017)

No, there is no Spring Waltz written by Chopin. —ITeachThem (talk) 23:55, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To even think of that is absolutely foolish. Any student familiar with Chopin knows that Chopin never named his works. It's not even a waltz. This shows how dangerous modern spread of information is. Now hundreds of millions of people think it's a piece by Chopin due to a simple clickbait YouTube video. Now if you applied the same ignorance to other aspects of life, you could start actual wars. Oh wait... --82.207.237.48 (talk) 17:36, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@82.207.237.48
Excellence response! 2600:1702:7E0:9360:D7BA:D79C:C5F3:75B8 (talk) 02:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Removed content relating to misnaming of the piece on Youtube. Reason: No original research. See WP:NOR for info. Please use reliable secondary sources instead such as a news post on the topic. 2001:14BA:2F8:F700:18C7:3F3F:86DC:AC6 (talk) 13:57, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, all the misunderstandings started on YouTube, so it's impossible to refer to the problems without mentioning the platform. No scientific writer is going to cover it in their thesis. --82.207.237.48 (talk) 17:44, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mariage d'amour. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mariage_d%27amour&oldid=1215178573"