Jump to content

Talk:Maria Hertogh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Incorrect picture

[edit]

I removed the image showing the riots because if you see History of Singapore and the merger section, it looks more like the Kallangworks riots, (bigger photo), than the Hertogh ones, I do think. Of course, if not, then its one or the other. Hmm. Well insert it back in if you contest it, anyway. -- Natalinasmpf 23:01, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Sharp eyes. :-) -- Vsion 18:46, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Malaysia or Malaya or Malay Peninsular

[edit]

I think, all references to Malaysia should be renamed Malaya. It's a little bit more accurate considering that Malaysia was formed in 1963. __earth 07:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

References to Malaysia in this article refers to the archipelago (that is present day) Malaysia. The term "Malaya" conventionally includes Singapore. Thus to differentiate between the archipelago and the island, "Malaysia" is used. That is also the general practice in modern day writings. --Plastictv 14:45, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. In our case, it's Malaya as a political entity instead of a geographic body. By 1948, Federation of Malaya was a country, separated from Singapore. And Malaya wasn't Malaysia yet until 1963. And certainly, shouldn't it be called Malayan army instead of Malaysian army. Malayan army and Malaysian army refer to two different entities even though they share a continuous line. People in 1950 didn't even know what Malaysia was. I mean, did Italian senators kill Caesar in 44BC or were it Romans? __earth 16:59, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I know where you're coming from. However, i do not see a better way to distinguish between Malaysia and Singapore in this article. You changed, for example, "Malaysian nationalists" to "Malayan nationalists". This is inaccurate because the original phrase refers to people from the archipelago Malaysia (or West Malaysia) and not Singapore.
The differences between Singapore and Malaysia are also a very sensitive and complex issue, and i'll not discuss it at length here. i do believe, though, that it is appropriate to refer to the two entities, political or geographical, as Malaysia and Singapore instead of using the ambiguous term "Malaya". --Plastictv 13:51, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What about "Peninsular Malaya"? -- Natalinasmpf 16:18, 19 December 2005 (UTC). No such term as Malaya refers to Malay Peninsular. The land of the Malay includes Peninsular and Malay Archipelago(Isles). Malaysia is short term of Malay in Asia meaning Malay lands.Why British use Malaya is because they are use to Indian Malayalam and Singapura to Singapur as the are use to term pur in India such as Brahmapur,Bhagalpur,Bharatpur,Bilaspur,Burhanpur,Chandrapur Jaipur Cities.Later corrupted to Singapore sound like Lahore.[reply]

Personally i do not recall having seen this term before. In the two references i cited, one written by an European residing in Singapore at that time and the other by a Malaysian researcher, "Malaysia" was used to refer to what is known today as Peninsular Malaysia. Therefore my conformation to, what i believe would be, the general practice in historical writing. --Plastictv 20:16, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I haven't heard of Peninsular Malaya neither. Milton Osborne, an expert of Southeast Asian history who wrote Southeast Asia: An introductory history seems to be careful about the distinction between Malaya and Malaysia. Moreover, Singapore is considered part of Malaya before 1946 - that's before Singapore was made a crown colony. After 1946, the difference between Malaya, Malaysia and Singapore is clear in historical timeline. When a person talks of Malaya after 1946, to my understanding, it refers to Federation of Malaya only, Singapore not included. Furthermore, the term Malaya is still in use today to describe West Malaysia and that term certainly doesn't consider Singapore as part of Malaya. In the same case, it doesn't include Pattani and other Malay Thai states in the north. But anyway, I've asked Adam Carr for a piece of his mind. He seems to be a historian. So, he should have an authority in the subject. __earth 03:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
An expert's opinion would be helpful. :) --Plastictv 01:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
But then again, Peninsular Malaysia also includes part of Present-Day Thailand, or more specifically, the Southern Part of Thailand. Anyways, I prefer Malaya because Malaysia wasn’t a country UNTIL 1963, and most historians use British Malaya as Malaysia was indeed British Malaya. But then again, Malaya includes Singapore, so we’re kinda stuck. But Malaya leads the pack ForThePremier (talk) 13:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Religion at end?

[edit]

The article doesn't really state specifically what religion she followed by the end, it says she began attending Mass with her parents and married a Catholic but I can't find any point where it states unambiguously that she either ceased to be a Muslim or not. --Hydraton31 14:22, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dubious

[edit]

According to 1964 Race Riots, taken together "the violence killed 36 people and injured another 556.". Even if we don't consider them together the July riots in particular "About 23 people lost their lives and 450 people were injured during the July riots. There was significant damage to property and vehicles.". I don't see then how these riots "with 18 killed, 173 injured and many properties damaged – the worst incident of its kind ever witnessed in Singapore." can be said to be the worst incident of it's kind (and it's not sourced either). Of course, these riots were more about religion then race however they're still comparable incidents IMHO. Nil Einne 19:29, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These riots although caused less casualties, the properties lost and damaged were a lot. The British lost thousands of dollars and even more were needed to repair the damaged buildings.--~Chemicalrubber (talk) 11:56, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent

[edit]

What happened to Maria in recent times? (last ten years) Anyone knows? - Up and over for a six! (talk) 08:38, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

the 5 that was sent to the gallows

[edit]

I have added my late grand father's name who was one of the 5 that was sent to the gallows and later walked away with the help of Tengku Abdul Rahman. Sir David Marshall was the criminal lawyer representing the 5. But he lost the case. I am in in process of gathering facts abt my late grand father. Soon I'll have him on wikipedia on how he was involved and things done to him while we has on trial and so on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.117.255.16 (talk) 04:26, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, if some editors needed some source for it, it might get re-edited, be careful out there. ForThePremier (talk) 13:47, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I recommend to log in or else your IP address might be compromised ForThePremier (talk) 13:57, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maria Hertogh riots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maria Hertogh riots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:40, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"adoptive elder sister, Kamariah Mohd Dahan"

[edit]

If it's necessary to bring Kamariah into the story at all, it seems wrong to refer to her as a sibling. She and Maria have neither a legal nor blood relationship. It's also unclear that "adoptive" and "of Japanese descent" refer to Kamariah being adopted by Aminah and Mansoor. NeoAdamite (talk) 15:53, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the phrasing used by the Straits Times article and while it is unclear that a blood or legal relationship was definitively established, since the legality of the adoption of Nadrah by Che Aminah is a major part of the article, Kamariah was de facto regarded by Nadrah as her sister. I have also added clarifying phrasing in an earlier section of the article surrounding the circumstances of Kamariah's adoption and removed the confusing wording you mentioned. 緑里郁子 (talk) 13:22, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed for the “Oriental strangers” in the Aftermaths of the riots section

[edit]

I did some digging and found no sources backing it up. Tried CNA but couldn’t find anything, anyone got any clue? ForThePremier (talk) 13:49, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]