This article was nominated for deletion on 2 May 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
Hi Megalibrarygirl - I've noted at the AfD that I want to withdraw the nomination following the improvements you (and others) have made to the article. Looking at it in its current state, there's one thing that still troubles me about it, but I thought I'd better raise it here before making a change.
The only quote we're using from any of the reviews is very positive: "a lovingly crafted and mostly well-executed take on the genre". That quote is certainly in there, but there are quite a few less positive things it has to say, and the other substantial review is pretty negative ("If it were a film, it would go straight to video"). Wouldn't it be more faithful to the sources to say something along the lines of 'her recordings received mixed reviews from critics'? I know that's a bit WP:SYNTHy, but at present it looks like we're cherry picking the most positive quote we can find. Cheers GirthSummit (blether)08:55, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Girth Summit: I think that's a good idea. The sentence you quote was already in the article, but you're right: not everyone liked her work all the time! We could maybe add a negative review to balance it out. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oh yes, sorry, I wasn't meaning to suggest that you'd added it. You've done a great job of tidying it up, I just think this is one last thing that needs to change. We could add a negative review for balance, but I'm wondering if there's something more nuanced we could say. As I read them, both reviews seem to be saying that the music is incredibly niche, but that it 'ticks the boxes' that the genre calls for - I'm not sure I'm expressing that very well, but hopefully you know what I mean. Do you think it would be possible to express that somehow within the article based on the sources we've got? GirthSummit (blether)17:43, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
