Talk:Marge Be Not Proud/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am nominating this article for review, primarily because of its "Plot" section failing 1.a in the criteria. It needs to have a fresh pair of eyes looking at it and be re-written. GamerPro64 20:17, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from a few copy edits I don't really see much wrong with it. What is wrong in specific? 1a encompass many points. 23W 20:53, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the cleanup tag; how does the plot section look now? 23W 21:01, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Structurally, the section looks better. But maybe the entire article needs a total copyedit, because I don't find it to be written well. Maybe request a copyeditor or something. GamerPro64 21:18, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article was promoted a way's ago so it's not to surprising that it would need some TLC. Probably doesn't warrant a GAR but I'll still help out in improving it. 23W 21:49, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-written it a bit, for accuracy (both in terms of grammar and what actually happened in the episode) and flow. This is how it looked when the article first passed, so it's far longer now. Gran² 22:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Plot section looks extremely better than before, thank you Gran. Now I decided to look at the references in the article and I'm not sure if Amazon is a reliable source [1]. I don't usually look at articles involving TV shows so I don't know what is reliable or not. GamerPro64 22:44, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This AV Club review (written in 2014) can be integrated: http://www.avclub.com/tvclub/simpsons-marge-be-not-proud-203093 --Coin945 (talk) 09:30, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I tried clicking on it but resulted in me getting 404'd and closed my browser. GamerPro64 13:58, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Those two "--" before my signature were part of the url. I fixed it now.--Coin945 (talk) 15:03, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not exactly sure how the AV Club review will be implemented into the article but besides that, I think everything is in order and will close this review and have the article maintain its GA status. GamerPro64 02:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]