Talk:Marbury, Cheshire

Cheshire Low‑importance

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Marbury, Cheshire appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the listed buildings of Marbury cum Quoisley in Cheshire, England, include an obelisk, a lychgate (pictured), a churchyard wall, and half a bridge?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/May.

Wikipedia

Assessment Report

Article needs to be massively expanded using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
It should make use of sections, using Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements as a guide.
Photos may be better as a "gallery", and not too many of them! Add most of them to Wikimedia Commons.
References and Citations are crucial for wikipedia, and so these must be added as the article is expanded. Make sure that as many as possible are "in-line" citations.(See WP:References, WP:V, and WP:CITE for guidance.)

Peter I. Vardy 10:06, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too Many Photos at the moment

I think there are too many photos here at the moment. I think use should be made of Wikimedia Commons to place most of them there, as at the moment, they are over-powering the rest of the article. If (or when) the article grows somewhat, perhaps more photos can be added. At the moment, I would say a maximum of about 3 or 4 photos should be included here. For details of how to move photos to Wikimedia Commons, Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons can be consulted. DDStretch (talk) 13:29, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Marbury Mere" photos and section

The heading in the gallery and the photos themselves need some additional clarification. This is because there is formally no single body of water that could be relevant here that is called "Marbury Mere". Instead, there are two meres very close to Marbury, and both could be informally called "Marbury Mere": The "Big Mere" and the "Little Mere" (see the OS Map West Sheet 257). In one of the other photos in a different section the position of the church leads me to believe that the photos are of the "Big Mere", but the article needs more confirmation of that if possible. The labelling needs to be changed to be more accurate. Probably the addition to their names of "at Marbury" could be used, particularly as there are Quoisley Big and Quoisley Little Meres in the same civil parish, but that is a less pressing issue. DDStretch (talk) 22:22, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marbury Mere usually refers to Marbury Big Mere; all the photos here are of that one. The Little Mere is shown in this Geograph photo: [1]. Espresso Addict 12:09, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've added some clarification in the appropriate places. I hope it preserves both the formal official name, and, from what you write, what is the locally accepted name for Big Mere at Marbury. Please alter the changes if you think they can be further improved. DDStretch (talk) 12:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed it to Marbury Big Mere as that's the usual local name. The photo gallery could do with some heavy pruning, particularly of all the Marbury Merry Days photos. Espresso Addict 13:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References for further expansion

Mackenzie, Paul. A Tale of Two Marburys. Cheshire Life, April 2005, p204-207
Best Kept Marbury. Cheshire Life, November 1999, p72-73
Yarwood, Derek. Best Kept Marbury. Cheshire Life, December 1990, p58-61 Espresso Addict (talk) 22:28, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Query date of tree

I think the pictures are excellent and I don't understand why anyone should say there are too many. But I have a problem with the following senttence. " In the centre is a village green with a mature oak tree, planted in 1814 to commemorate the Battle of Waterloo." The Battle of Waterloo took place in 1815. How did they know a year in advance that there would be a battle to commemorate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gobanian (talk • contribs) 16:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment to the pictures -- the earlier comment referred to a completely different version. Good point about the date of Waterloo. One source that says it was planted in 1814, the other that it was planted to commemorate the Battle of Waterloo, but they can't both be right! As I don't know which is correct, I will try to find a compromise statement. Thanks for pointing it out. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:46, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Structure of this page

Is there are reason why this Talk page is unusually structured, with the pseudo-header "Assessment Report" strangely separate and excluded from the ToC? I'm tempted to boldly fold it in as an ordinary header, which to my mind would be more standard and easier on the eye; however do please argue if there's a reason not to. I do think, by the way that the article is excellent! I came here because Marbury Mere was the Ordnance Survey wallpaper for June, and very pretty too! Thanks and best wishes 82.45.217.156 (talk) 12:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC) (established user on part-successful visit to Cold Turkey Land)[reply]

No response since 30 June, attempting to change, please feel free to revert or comment, thanks DBaK (talk) 08:36, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Marbury, Cheshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]