Talk:Manufacturers Trust Company Building/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 02:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 02:57, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Basic stuff and comments

• Lead is 4 paragraph but it goes with MOS:LEADLENGTH.
• Remove the comma after "the original proposal".
  • Done.
• "The panes at the second floor" → "The panes on the second floor"
  • Done.
• Remove the comma after "covered by moldings".
  • Done.
• "as it were floating" → "as it was floating" (consistency)
  • Fixed.
• "A pair of escalators leads" → "A pair of escalators lead"
  • Fixed. A pair is typically singular but I just changed it to "two escalators". Epicgenius (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
• In #First_floor, remove the comma after "Fifth Avenue facade".
  • Done.
• "into a dining room, and had a ebony" → "into a dining room and had an ebony"
  • Done.
• "second busiest" → "second-busiest"
  • Done.
• Remove the comma after "Manhattan's Financial District".
  • Done.
• "successor firm Walker & Poor were" → "successor firm Walker & Poor was" (company)
  • Done.
• "parapet at the second floor" → "parapet on the second floor"
  • Done.
• "The vault in particular proved" → "The vault, in particular, proved"
  • Done.
• Remove the comma after "traditional bank vaults".
  • Done.
• and "symbol of" → and a "symbol of"
  • Done.
• WP:NYPOST - New York Post is unreliable.
  • Replaced.
• Mark sources from The New York Times with "|url-access=limited".
  • Done.

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Thanks for the review. I have addressed all of the issues above. Epicgenius (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.