Talk:Manning's Law
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
I'd like to nominate this for deletion. This is not notable in the field (I am a professor of NLP and I've literally never heard of it), nor is it mentioned in the cited material as far as I can tell. The whole page appears to be an attempt to astroturf a eponymous law Kylebgorman (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- The term does appear on slide 12 of this cited reference. 73.222.1.26 (talk) 20:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Does it matter at all the reference isn't archival? 20:25, 9 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylebgorman (talk • contribs)
- Yes, but the right way to handle it is to ask Leon Derczynski, who added it here (he has open DMs on Twitter but hasn't been active here for almost a year) and find out how prevalent he thinks the term actually is, whether it has other usage than those slides, and whether Manning approves. 73.222.1.26 (talk) 20:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- I don't think his opinion is more important than anyone else's, and I don't think his opinion is important at all. Kylebgorman (talk) 15:50, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, but the right way to handle it is to ask Leon Derczynski, who added it here (he has open DMs on Twitter but hasn't been active here for almost a year) and find out how prevalent he thinks the term actually is, whether it has other usage than those slides, and whether Manning approves. 73.222.1.26 (talk) 20:33, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
- Does it matter at all the reference isn't archival? 20:25, 9 March 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylebgorman (talk • contribs)