Talk:Manila Bulletin

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

2nd Most-Read Daily

I added this news on survey.

--Florentino floro 04:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I add news on Panorama.

--Florentino floro 14:46, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First in Philippine history, case

Philippine photographer Anton Sheker filed on June 5, 2008, a landmark copyright infringement [1] lawsuit (Civil Case no. 08-436) against Manila Bulletin (Ivy Liza Mendoza, Rachel C. Barawid and Editor-in-chief Cris Icban). It allegedly downloaded Internet photos (camera EXIF data) from his personal blog[2] used for a travel feature without his permission.prweb.com, Philippine Photographer Sues Major Daily for Copyright Infringement Abs-Cbn Interactive, Who's got your shot?GMA NEWS.TV, Photog sues Manila Bulletin for copyright infringement--Florentino floro (talk) 12:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pwede po bang malaman yung mga events na nangyari sa bulacan?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.147.65.236 (talk) 06:10, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manila Bulletin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091211215118/http://newsinfo.inquirer.net:80/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=108388 to http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/nation/view_article.php?article_id=108388

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:45, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manila Bulletin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140728014753/http://ww2.aijc.com.ph/PCCF/mediamuseum/thehall/the-hall-living.htm to http://ww2.aijc.com.ph/PCCF/mediamuseum/thehall/the-hall-living.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:55, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manila bulletin

Primary or secondary sources 64.226.58.41 (talk) 12:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me for winning lotterynothing to me receive.and we block me...ma'amAlice loyd.who block my account...please the management....thanks you.. 64.226.58.41 (talk) 05:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manila Bulletin, Controversy or legal issue 2024

First, I considered placing a tag on this section : "This article documents a current event. Information may change rapidly as the event progresses, and initial news reports may be unreliable. The latest updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. Feel free to improve this article or discuss changes on the talk page, but please note that updates without valid and reliable references will be removed. Second, I now think I will edit the subtitle to Controversy instead of legal issue. Reason: the hacking scandal involves only an editor and data officer, not MB itself. In Philippine Civil Law, torts and damages is a subsection like Persons and family relations with subsection of marriage annulment, property with subsection of Copyright, trademark, trade name. No case had been filed against the entire Giant News Paper MB. Hence, at present, MB is not a party defendant even if it is liable for torts and omissions of its employees.

Third, at the times I began editing the article, I was faced with current hacking events which metamorphosed. I wrote it in an objective manner leaving no stones upturned. Fourth, my beloved Valenzuela, Metro Manila city, my former hometown, is celebration its 400th foundation, and I desired to contribute in the one year ongoing feasting. Note that I was focused on stars, actors personal drama, starting from Euwenn Mikaell Aleta; next, but first, on Horse-racing especially the Saudi Cup, Triple Crown, the cuisine, railways, etc. But legalese and controversies are not my keen interest here.

Finally, I am editing this subsection, which subsides from current event to encyclopedia. I opt not to take off the salient features, for I remember that reverting scandals may be vandalism. I think I refer to 10 years ago in I not mistaken of deleting a scandal made by the High Office itself, in just hours, Wikipedia undid it and restored the scandal. It is my philosophy not to participate in edit wars. I never touched a revert or edit of my edit by another editor. I focus on positive additions and I will do the best, and let the Presidents do the rest, paraphrasing a Lubao great President. very sincerely yours Valenzuela400 (talk) 11:23, 28 June 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@Valenzuela400 still, there is a tone of newspaper editorial in your contribution. By splitting the section into two disjoined sections, you have compounded the problem. I have reverted it; you should instead condense the subsection into a single paragraph, without editorial tone that may lean to a breach in WP:NEWSPAPER. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]