Talk:Manhattan Investment Fund

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why I reverted edits by 178.191.128.115

Their edits appear biased.
They added no references to support their changes and in fact removed most of the existing refs.
The fact that they tried to blank or mostly blank the page at least twice—and likely a total of 4 times, given the similar pattern of edits—before resorting to editing implies they have an agenda.

I'm fairly new at this so I can't quote the relevant guidelines, but these seem like clear violations to me. Alcapwned86 (talk) 13:28, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, just read and this is an obvious attack and abusing Wikipedia to do it. I'll take a deeper dive.--LedgerTom (talk) 14:57, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]