Talk:Mangifera indica

Agriculture Mid‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Champagne Mango

Am I correct in thinking this is what's known as a "champagne mango"? I am unsure, but would like to add the information to the appropriate article. Quantumelfmage (talk) 14:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Potential reference

Moved from Further reading section:

Masibo, M. / He, Q. “Major Mango Polyphenols and Their Potential Significance to Human Health”, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety (2008),7(4):309-319.

--Ronz (talk) 03:07, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your opinion and suggestion.

This review is meant for readers who would like to delve deeper into the subject.

The review is placed in the “further reading” – section because the Wikipedia guideline for this section read: “… publications that would help interested readers learn more about the article subject. The Further reading section (…) should normally not duplicate the content of the References section” (WP:FURTHER).

The Wikipedia content guideline for “Identifying reliable sources (medicine)” (WP:MEDRS) read: “It is usually best to use reviews and meta-analyses where possible.”

The review in question reflect the latest research (last 10 years) in the field, it is scholarly and peer-reviewed, and it is published in an academic journal. Granateple (talk) 13:30, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Mangifera indica be merged into Mango. I think that the content in the Mangifera indica article can easily be explained in the context of Mango, and the Mango article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Mangifera indica will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Ahmer Jamil Khan 06:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to inform you that the article Mango is about the fruit and only provides general information about Mango as any other fruit. However, Mangifera indica is about a particular species of Mango which is found in India and provides information regarding that species only. Merging these two articles might lead to confusion among readers. Citing above reasons, I do not agree with the proposal. Thank you. Abhishek Pujari (talk) 12:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. This proposal is backwards. If there is to be merger then this article should remain and Mango should be merged into it and converted to a redirect. Plantsurfer 20:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mangifera indica. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130122081811/http://www.knowindia.gov.in/knowindia/national_symbols.php?id=13 to http://knowindia.gov.in/knowindia/national_symbols.php?id=13

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]