Jump to content

Talk:Mandyam Veerambudi Srinivasan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Just started page - apologies for brevity. Can someone who knows how apply a stub template please? I'll be back asap to fill it out a little. Tomythius (talk) 00:40, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mandyam Veerambudi Srinivasan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Allegation of misconduct is baseless

[edit]

There has been a recent modification to this page which includes an allegation of academic misconduct. This is baseless and inaccurate. Some typographical inconsistencies were identified in a couple of publications which have seemingly been rectified and published as corrections. This does not constitute academic misconduct but simply typographical errors which have now been rectified. Therefore, such an allegation is defamatory and should be removed. 220.233.4.46 (talk) 01:40, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the above comment. An allegation of scientific misconduct, based on a few typographical errors that have been corrected and published as errata, is unjustified. 103.100.225.170 (talk) 02:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

[edit]

An allegation of scientific misconduct, based on a few typographical errors that have been corrected and published as errata, is unjustified. 103.100.225.170 (talk) 02:34, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]