Jump to content

Talk:Manav Rachna University

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeManav Rachna University was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 8, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed

Note

[edit]

Hello there. Please do not put this up for deletion for a while. I am working with the creator to get this up and running. I already know the sources need work and the whole thing needs copy-editing, but that will take a few days to complete. Thanks for your consideration. Sven Manguard Talk 05:08, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE

[edit]

please dont delete this article. just tell me what changes should be made in this article to make it look appropriate. i have no intention to advertise this college. i just created this article as i am a student of this college and it was heartbreaking for me to not have my college on wikipedia. PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Garvitkamboj (talk) 07:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

[edit]

I have done some editing on my own to make it look like a good article rather than an advertisement. I request Sven sir to edit this article according to wikipedia guidelines. thanksGarvitkamboj (talk) 12:25, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Manav Rachna College of Engineering/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 122.176.150.135 (talk · contribs) 20:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outside comment I'm rather concerned that the IP doing the review here has no other edits except for starting this. As someone who has followed this article from afar, I'd be willing to do the review if the starting of the review is some sort of mistake. If not, I'll just observe. Just a note, this article has had some strange history, see this. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:48, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a note, Sven, IPs can't review articles. They can nominate them, but not review. So, feel free to go ahead with the review. Dana boomer (talk) 22:54, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, I'm probably too involved to do the review. Sven Manguard Wha? 00:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Technical fail

[edit]

IPs can't do reviews so I am failing this nomination. Looking at the article it is not of GA standards, if the niomintor wants feedback, try reading WP:WIAGA and perhaps a peer review. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.