Jump to content

Talk:Mamilla Mall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Mamilla Mall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GGT (talk · contribs) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have read the article and found the read truly enjoyable, congratulations on your beautiful work here! Regarding a few very minor concerns that I have, I will make a few bold changes to proceed with the review. --GGT (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Location, history and retail sections: All in compliance with WP:WIAGA.
  • Exhibitions and events: Was concerned with the use of blogs here, but the same content is verified by other reliable sources, which I would say is enough alone.
  • Attempted terror attack: In compliance with WP:WIAGA. I would suggest this section to be incorporated into the history section, but I can imagine the rationale with its separation, as the history section is more concerned with the development of the mall/its site.

--GGT (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citations to reliable sources:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

This nomination has passed, congratulations! A very thorough, fine and interesting piece of work, with extensive illustration of the article. Thank you for the enjoyable read --GGT (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mamilla Mall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:16, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page name

[edit]

I object to the unilateral page move from Mamilla Mall to Mamilla Center per one source, the architect's page. No other source calls it Mamilla Center. I am seeking administrative action to restore the original page name and designation as Mamilla Mall. Pinging @Beyond My Ken:. Yoninah (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Beyond My Ken: please explain why you decided to move this page? I see no talk about it either here, would be appropriate, or on your talk page. All sources I see when I do an internet search refer to this as Mamilla Mall, which makes your page move not in accordance with WP:COMMON. — Maile (talk) 18:55, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That's what the architect calls it, but if there are objections, I'll move it back. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:08, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


THANKS!! — Maile (talk) 20:11, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]