Talk:Mamilla Mall/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Mamilla Center/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GGT (talk · contribs) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
I have read the article and found the read truly enjoyable, congratulations on your beautiful work here! Regarding a few very minor concerns that I have, I will make a few bold changes to proceed with the review. --GGT (talk) 22:20, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Location, history and retail sections: All in compliance with WP:WIAGA.
- Exhibitions and events: Was concerned with the use of blogs here, but the same content is verified by other reliable sources, which I would say is enough alone.
- Attempted terror attack: In compliance with WP:WIAGA. I would suggest this section to be incorporated into the history section, but I can imagine the rationale with its separation, as the history section is more concerned with the development of the mall/its site.
--GGT (talk) 22:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citations to reliable sources:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
This nomination has passed, congratulations! A very thorough, fine and interesting piece of work, with extensive illustration of the article. Thank you for the enjoyable read --GGT (talk) 22:45, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)