Talk:Mamakating, New York

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

New York (state) Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History clarification?

Regarding the quote: The town of Mamakating was organized on March 7, 1788 and was the first township of Sullivan County.

Mamakating may have been the first township of Sullivan County, but 1788 it was still in Ulster County. Sullivan County didn't cleave off from Ulster until 1809. In 1788, was Mamakating the same size and shape it is today, with Frantzdale (then Homowack, now Spring Glen, nicknamed "County Line") straddling the border of Mamakating and Wawarsing?

Here's a 1758 map that shows early patents and precincts in what is now Orange County, Rockland County, parts of Sullivan and Ulster Counties, and northern New Jersey. You may have to join the group to see it, though. Back then, the size and shape was indeed different. Look in the photo album section: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocgsny/photos/album/365043629/pic/1267068899/view?picmode=large&mode=tn&order=ordinal&start=1&dir=asc

Thank you for your time, Wordreader (talk) 01:14, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Authorship of history section

The history section was added at https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Mamakating,_New_York&diff=103978006&oldid=74051772 showing John Masten as author. A version that looks the same is still on the historical society website with his name at the bottom. However, The WP article has been much edited and now mentions his name but not as the author. Can one assume that the above-mentioned edit adding the history was sufficient attribution? Was John the author who added his work here (thus making the current version OK without specific attribution)? That editor's contribution page - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Markscheck - contains some edit summaries that suggest otherwise, e.g.

" 2013-01-14T15:22:33 (diff | hist) . . (+6,385)‎ . . Wurtsboro, New York ‎ (Used the official history, took out the subjective information, adding a whole new page for Wurtsboro Hills.)"

Robin Patterson (talk) 06:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mamakating, New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]