Talk:Malonic acid

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Chemicals Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Use

WHERE MALONI ACID IS USED . —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 221.134.253.151 (talk • contribs) .

Indigo test

one of the material for making indigo reagent for indigo test, which is a test for presence of OA. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 158.132.12.80 (talk • contribs) .

Clock Reactions

Also used in the Briggs-Rauscher Reaction (a.k.a. iodine clock reactions). JKeck (talk) 17:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Origin of Name

Why is the name taken from the Greek word for apple? Is it related to apples? JKeck (talk) 17:26, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't the Greek word be μηλο, i.e. apple? What's up right now as the word for apple doesn't really translate into anything...

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Malonic acid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100602043012/http://research.chem.psu.edu/brpgroup/pKa_compilation.pdf to http://research.chem.psu.edu/brpgroup/pKa_compilation.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Difluoromalonic acid

IP editor(s) have been adding a redlink for difluoromalonic acid by renaming the final section of the article "Related compounds" rather than "Salts and esters" for the first time here and then here and here (the current version). I have twice reverted these additions on the grounds 1) that there is no evidence this compound is any more notable than the thousands of other possible derivatives of malonic acid which don't have Wikipedia articles (although this one is in Wikidata); 2) that "related compounds" usually are linked from the Chembox; 3) that the edits which have been made contain external links (to Pubchem) in the body of the article text, so are not compliant with WP:EL.

I would have reverted this edit again but the IP editor left a detailed edit summary PubChem is authoritative but not as accessible at Wikipedia. It seems better to add this chemical in context to its parent than start a new page. This chemical has been subject of patents. It is also notable as potential PFAS. Not sure why you are discouraging a GFE? So they clearly they believe that being mentioned in patents and/or being a potential Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (a group already containing at least 4730 compounds according to our article) is enough justification for the mention. I disagree. What do others think? Mike Turnbull (talk) 14:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]