Talk:Makers Academy
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Someone noted that this was 'not significant', according to - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)
If this is so, then how is this any different? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Dev_bootcamp
The reference to an advertorial has been removed.
- I agree it's not significant, and most likely written by an interested party. It reads like and advert and gives too much detail for small private business. Regarding Dev Bootcamp, in my opinion it suffers from the same flaws. I think both articles should be deleted altogether. -- Pablo Brasero (talk) 10:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
- I was the original party who mentioned that it does not meet notability guidelines. After that point it went down a pipeline: following the agreement of other Wikipedians, this page was flagged for removal and deleted 30 days later. The fact of the matter is that there isn't even a parent page addressing the phenomenon of development bootcamps as an educational institution. This means that all such articles are very clearly self-interest driven for the purpose of publicity or SEO link building. The Dev Bootcamp article doesn't meet the guidelines either. Non-notable articles are a major challenge for Wikipedians and it's difficult to flag them all. -Orun Bhuiyan (talk)
- Alright, I've flagged Dev bootcamp and Makers academy as an article that doesn't appear to meet notability requirements with the specifics of the issue being described on the :talk page. If I receive no strong objections I'll move it on to AfD for further delibration. - Orun Bhuiyan (talk) 22:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
- Nominated, now going through AfD. 108.168.37.4 (talk) 13:14, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
- Alright, I've flagged Dev bootcamp and Makers academy as an article that doesn't appear to meet notability requirements with the specifics of the issue being described on the :talk page. If I receive no strong objections I'll move it on to AfD for further delibration. - Orun Bhuiyan (talk) 22:20, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Makers Academy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130831010514/http://www.makersacademy.com:80/info/payment-plans to http://www.makersacademy.com/info/payment-plans
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:58, 26 February 2016 (UTC)