Talk:Make Room for Lisa/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 15:23, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

No images anyway, so we're golden

2. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Wikilink the characters in the plot section (Marge, Homer etc)
• Remember to have sentences with quotes end with citations

That's really it. Nice work! As always, I'll place the review on hold for seven days, though I know you'll get to it before then :) Ruby2010 comment! 15:45, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

I think I've fixed all the problems now. As always, thanks for the review! :D Queenieacoustic (talk) 16:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Looks good. Pass for GA. Ruby2010 comment! 16:15, 19 July 2011 (UTC)