Talk:Mahmud I of Delhi

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

India: Delhi / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 15:47, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ghiyas ud din was a gardiant of nasiruddin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.119.113 (talk) 02:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

H.G. Raverty

@Poulami Das 2001: H.G. Raverty was a colonial officer, not a trained historian - as discussed at WP:RSN and WT:IND several times, colonial officers turned amateur historians are not acceptable sources. Satish Chandra is a good source, but please cite the page number. I don't have access to the 2020 edition, but the 2007 edition doesn't seem to make any mention of "distress", "scandal" or "exile" -- it just states "Nasiruddin Mahmud, a younger son of Iltutmish, whom Balban had helped...". If the new edition has some additional information, please provide a quote. It's quite possible that Nizami's theory is wrong, but multiple other historians describe the subject Iltutmish's grandson, so it's important to mention the other view. utcursch | talk 14:48, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Utcursch: I apologize for this revert Utcursch - (diff) - this wasn't on purpose though, I erroneously restored one of your earlier revisons to revert contentious additions by Poulami Das 2001. Beg-pardon again. ∆ P&t ♀√ (talk) 19:20, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I figured that must have been in error, that's why I thanked you for that edit. utcursch | talk 05:05, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]