Talk:Mahāmada

Bhavishya Purana

ok, the "prophecy" turns out to be a 19th century interpolation in the Bhavishya Purana. There is nothing to see here, and whatever quotable tidbits may be into this should be merged into Bhavishya Purana. dab (𒁳) 14:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

We still going to read and get into Bhavishya Purana so far the following books are going to be researched and investagated are Rig Veda, Sama Ved, Bhagwat Purana, Bhavishya Purana, The Book of Mahamadans (Times of Mahamadan), Atharaveda (on Audio hymns and print), Kalki Avatar and others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DWhiskaZ (talk • contribs)

Mahamadans

Note - There was an period when it was known as Mahamadan Times. so the people of Mahamadans which were also Hindus got disrupted by other religons or something like that. Its just an notice --DWhiskaZ (talk) 05:31, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

We still going to read and get into Bhavishya Purana so far the following books are going to be researched and investagated are Rig Veda, Sama Ved, Bhagwat Purana, Bhavishya Purana, The Book of Mahamadans (Times of Mahamadan), Atharaveda (on Audio hymns and print), Kalki Avatar and others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DWihskaZ (talk • contribs)

DWihskaZ, would you mind explaining exactly what you're trying to do here? If there's a book somewhere that claims that there is a Hindu god called "Mahamada", please cite that directly. Don't interpret sources, that's WP:OR. --Alvestrand (talk) 15:30, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Protected

I've currently semi-protected this page for 5 days, as it appears to be a target of abusive sockpuppetry (see, for instance, Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/DWhiskaZ). If needed, new users can request edits with the {{editprotected}} template. – Luna Santin (talk) 21:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)