Talk:Magomed Tushayev

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Magomed Tushayev article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 6 January 2023 by reviewer Mattdaviesfsic (talk · contribs).

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Discrimination Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Military history: Biography / Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

Russia: Military / Chechnya Low‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet, and CIS military history task force.
	This article is supported by the Chechnya task force.

Declining

Rusalkii, thank you for reviewing the draft. However, I disagree with your reasoning for the decline. Firstly, there's not one, but six articles from before 2022 cited in the article [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]. Note also that not all the 2022 sources talk about his death reported on 26 February. Some also discuss on whether he is actually dead or not, and some are about the supposed video in which he appeared. While it's all related to the report of his death, these additional debates add to notability in my opinion, as a single newspaper could have released three different articles on him, one on the report of his death, another on the video and another on the newspaper's analysis on the case. Not sure if I've made my point across with this.

Secondly, I am not sure if your interpretation of WP:BIO1E is adequate. Nowhere there does it say that all the sources must not be from around the same period. It advises against creating biographies for people known for one single event. Tushayev is clearly mostly notable because of his reported death, but also for being a high-ranking official on the Chechen military and for his role on the LGBT purges. If all the sources covering all of this came from the same day hypothetically, that in itself wouldn't go against WP:BIO1E, because the policy is not about the used sourcing.

I do not say that this article may be notable, as it is not too obvious in this case, but I believe that the reasons that you've given can be questioned. You are welcome to defend your position or perhaps reconsider your decision or decide to leave it to a third person. Super Ψ Dro 21:19, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Super Dromaeosaurus you are entirely right. I think I had been accidentally looking at the article-accessed dates in the citation, rather the publication, and had not opened and read every citation in a way that would have shown my mistake.

I am not entirely sure if this all adds up to notability anyway, the sourcing from before his death all adds up to pretty thin coverage all things considered, but it's much less clear cut than I thought and I would not have been comfortable making that call. Please feel free to resubmit; I will leave a comment to make it clear to the next reviewer that my previous rejection was incorrect. Rusalkii (talk) 04:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I've resubmitted the draft. Super Ψ Dro 09:20, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Technically you undid the previous decline, which isn't technically "resubmitting"; I do apologise but I didn't realise this discussion predicated it, so I undid your edit, but I have now resubmitted the draft for review. Primefac (talk) 14:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Sorry, I don't know where exactly does one submit drafts, I do it manually. Super Ψ Dro 14:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, every decline notice has a "Resubmit" button on it (unless the page has already been resubmitted). Primefac (talk) 07:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah I just saw it, for some reason I hadn't seen it before even though its big. Thanks for your help. Super Ψ Dro 08:45, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]