Talk:Magnolia poasana

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Wood density given in article seems unearthly

Article lists wood density as "50g per cubic cm". That's 50 times the density of water and two and a half times the density of uranium. I somehow doubt that figure is correct; please verify. 129.7.115.1 (talk) 19:36, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Unfortunately, the reference web site is no longer available to check against. However, given the reference I just found says that the "specific weight"of M. poasana is "0.38" (no unit), I agree with you that "50g per cubic cm" seems a tad too dense. Must have been a typo. Hamamelis (talk) 05:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Magnolia poasana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090710014359/http://cloudbridge.org:80/trees/magnolia_poasana.html to http://www.cloudbridge.org/trees/magnolia_poasana.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:44, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]