Talk:Madinat al-Hareer

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Western Asia: Kuwait Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kuwait (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

according to emporis: it's a visionary, not a real project like burj dubai. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.130.148.225 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You think it sounds reasonable? --Ahmed 11:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

now the status is proposed, according to the emporis website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.115.28.110 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"However it would not overtake the Magnolia Tension-leg Platform, an oil rig under construction in the Gulf of Mexico, which at 1,430 m will be the world's tallest structure." Is a tension leg platform really considered a structure, including the legs? They're basically wires going down to the bottom. Would that mean that a balloon with 1431m wire tether would be the world's largest structure? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.202.97.157 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've copied part of a discussion about the Magnolia Tension-leg Platform from Talk:List_of_tallest_buildings_and_structures_in_the_world#Mars_Platform.3F -

It seems disingenuous to call them structures as these tethers seem to anchor it in place more than give it structure. - Ektar 16:27, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TLP's definitely don’t qualify. They are floating structures. And if you would want to include floating structures, there are deeper moored spar's and semi-submersibles. BoH 03:31, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If we're not considering floating structures, why is the Petronius Platform being mentioned? Is the Petronius Platform a floating structure? The article mentions that only 75 metres is above water. --Jibran1 17:30, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Petronius is a compliant tower, which is not floating. The tower fully supports the deck. BoH 19:23, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm removing the section as it's incorrect. Saikokira 02:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the tower is Burj Mubark al-Kabir, NOT: Mubark al-Kabir tower. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.130.151.214 (talk • contribs) 11:56, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Crackdown?

This looks like the Agency Tower from Crackdown! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSilverAce (talk • contribs) 01:37, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicting Details Between Tallest Building Article and Madinat al-Hareer Article.

In the Tallest Building article it has a proposed height of 1,500m while in this article it says 1,001m. Someone please fix this, and put the real one on both pages.

Super 4 Vegeta 13:21, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Burj Mubarak Tower Groundbreaking and Completion

Hi, I have noticed for quite some time that it says that the Burj Mubarak tower will ground break in 2008 and finish in 2011, or 2012. What evidence or source is there for this claim? How can a 1,001 meter building be built is 3 years? You can see the much smaller Burj Dubai took 5 years to build, so how can this much larger building be built by 2011, 2012?Maldek (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The lead paragraph says: "As of this time, it is unclear as to the scope of this project, if it has received any approvals, or if it has the required funding; however, the city will be built in individual phases with total completion within twenty-five years. The development will cost an estimated 25 billion Kuwaiti Dinars (86.1 billion USD). Burj Mubarak al-Kabir ..."

This is supported by a following the link to the official site, choosing "News Clipping", then the latest link to this article in arabianbusiness.com from November 2007. The article goes on to say "There is no indication yet as to when construction will begin"

The 2008 start date and 2011-12 end dates are probably based on information from one of the other sources which could easily be out of date by now.

If you are interested where those dates came from, check out the cited sources. If you want to update the article seek out newer data from a reliable source but please remember to cite your source (with <ref>[http://...]</ref> or take a look at other articles to see how sources are cited). Astronaut (talk) 21:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When was this building proposed?

I have a few questions because for the past few years I have noticed talk about building some buildings. Could anyone answer these questions for me?

What year was the Burj Dubai orginally proposed? What year was the Al Burj originally proposed? What year was the Burj Mubark originally proposed? What year was the Murjan City Tallest Tower orginally proposed? What year was the Mile High Tower originally proposed?

I would greatly appreciate it if somebody told me because I think Al Burj was proposed in 2004, but I am not sure about the other buildings. I don't know how long ago these buildings were proposed, or what year they were orginally proposed in. Does anybody know?Maldek (talk) 19:51, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think Burj Dubai was orignally proposed in 2003. See the Wired magazine source mentioned in this talk page discussion. Astronaut (talk) 22:08, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Madinat al-Hareer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927110709/http://www.kuwaittimes.net/read_news.php?newsid=MTE0ODEzMTQ4NQ== to http://www.kuwaittimes.net/read_news.php?newsid=MTE0ODEzMTQ4NQ==

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]