Talk:Machinefabriek
Appearance
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Re. Speedy Deletion - This is a notable artist. Have added references to confirm statements in article. What else is needed to corroborate notability? Qmwpeto (talk) 10:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Notable, for musical artists, is defined here: WP:MUSIC. Reliable sources would include established independent publications, as outlined here: WP:RS. All information presented has to be "verifiable," as outlined here: WP:V. If you have additional sources which would establish notability, please feel free to list them here on the talk page, even if you don't have time to format them on the article. Best regards with your editing. --OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 10:52, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the advice. Short list of notability "proof":
- Article in The Wire, 2008: http://www.thewire.co.uk/issues/292/
- 14 Tracks: http://14tracks.com/selections/24-14_tracks_deep_into_machinefabriek - referring to Machinefabriek as "One of the most prolific and interesting recording artists of our time" - sort of an exaggeration, but still. Qmwpeto (talk) 11:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)