Talk:Macaroni pie

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Macaroni pie article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

A fact from Macaroni pie appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 May 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that an American recipe from 1870 for macaroni pie (pictured) includes meat from squirrels, birds or wild ducks?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Macaroni pie.

Wikipedia

Caribbean: Barbados Low‑importance

	Caribbean portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Barbados (assessed as Low-importance).

Food and drink Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Speedy Deletion

Well, what would render it significant? http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Category:Scottish_cuisine contains many items of equal import. I further question the speedy deletion on the grounds that it is not a real person, individual animal(s), an organization nor web content.Pthag (talk) 11:50, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

"Wikipedia is not a food dictionary" is the worst reason for deletion I ever heard. It's an *encyclopedia*, this *includes* such things as items of cuisine. There are countless other items of food of similar notability and I would urge another mass-deletion spree to complement the one of biographies. I note also that Cuisine of Trinidad and Tobago at *least* mentions the Trinidadian version and making this page has, in fact, filled in a red link. Further, it is listed in Wikipedia:Requested_articles along with many other items that I now realise are infra dig for the glorious Wikipedia Project. I am not ignorant of the fact that the page has been created in the past -- in those events there may well have been no case, or a case poorly presented. I hope to do better. - Pthag (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]