Talk:MV Le Joola

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MV Le Joola article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Shipwrecks Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shipwrecks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of shipwreck-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShipwrecksWikipedia:WikiProject ShipwrecksTemplate:WikiProject ShipwrecksShipwreck articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shipwreck-related priority open tasks:

To Do

Lady Elizabeth (1879)
- Clean up typos Currently working on it-----Completed!
- Improve grammar
- Add any additions if needed Still adding more information
- Discuss desired additions -None

Africa: Gambia / Senegal High‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	The Gambia portal This article is supported by WikiProject Gambia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Senegal portal This article is supported by WikiProject Senegal.

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on September 26, 2011 and September 26, 2016.

Low importance?

I would contest this as low importance. It had a dramatic and lasting effect on Senegalese infrastructure (travel to Casameance from Dakar has never recovered, and tensions between the regions and lack of overland transport make such a link crucial), as well as Senegalese society. Ferry services, once a central plank og Senegalese popular transport, remain distrusted to this day.

Plus 1,863 died, the third worst sea disaster by loss of life in history.T L Miles 15:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rank among worst maritime peacetime disasters

The article claims that this was the second worst maritime peacetime disaster ever, but this article would suggest otherwise. Which is wrong? —Preceding unsigned comment added by -m-i-k-e-y- (talk • contribs) 19:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Exact death totals are hard to determine due to overloading and undercounting. List of maritime disasters shows the Le Joola as number four as to loss of life. This article should probably use a more general statement since we can't be completely sure.Shinerunner (talk) 23:03, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Number of people who died

There seems to be a contradiction with one of the numbers:

first section: "The disaster resulted in the deaths of at least 1,863 people."

section 'The ship': "The estimated number on board at the time of the disaster was 1,863, over triple the rated capacity."

section 'Last voyage': "Of the estimated 2,000 passengers, only around 64 survived ..."

I take it that the figure 1,863 is taken from some source. Then this would either indicate the number of people who drowned or the number of people who were on board. In the latter case, given that 64 survived, the number of people who drowned would be 1,799; or vice versa, the number of people on board would be 1,927. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.143.177.54 (talk) 07:39, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]