A fact from MT Botaş FSRU Ertuğrul Gazi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the Turkey-flagged LNGFSRUErtuğrul Gazi is with her daily regasification capacity of 28 million m3 among the world largest? Source: "Ertuğrul Gazi FSRU Delivered to Turkey's BOTAS ", "With a daily gasification capacity of 28 million cubic meters (990 million standard cubic feet) per day, the new FSRU ranks among the vessels with the highest send-out capacity in the world. " [1]
Not a review but FSRU is not a widely known acronym and should be spelt out, in my opinion (I think a case could be made for LNG also) - Dumelow (talk) 11:27, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: The article was new enough when nominated, is long enough (~3300 chars), and the QPQ looks good. All the substantive content is supported by citations to reliable published sources, and the article takes an appropriately neutral tone toward the topic. I'm not seeing signs of plagiarism from online sources. The proposed hook is supported by cited sources, and it's (just) short enough; I suppose it's interesting enough, too. This article is approved for DYK, with hook ALT1. Good work! Bryan Rutherford (talk) 14:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]