Talk:MS Berge Stahl

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Etymology 'Berge Stahl'

I think it's useful to have the meaning of ship's name in the article. Ctbolt 01:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but had to remove the paragraph below because it is incorrect in several places:

The name Berge Stahl means "Steel Mountain" when translated directly from German to English, but many of Bergesen's ships are named Berge "Something", Berge may be used as both first and last name in Norwegian. The word Berge does also mean to save or rescue in Norwegian.

Now, why one would want to try a German-to-English-translation to analyze the name of a Norwegian ship is a bit beyond me, but anyway: As a German native speaker, I can tell for sure that "Berge Stahl" is not a correct German construction. "Steel mountain" would translate to "Stahlberg". "berge!" is, however, the imperative form of "to salvage" in both German and Norwegian, but I believe that all that's behind the name is a pun on the shipowner's name. --217.225.15.12 04:10, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because 'Berge' is norwegian and 'Stahl' is german. The best (aproximate) translation I can come up with is 'Haul Steel'. 130.237.216.122 (talk) 09:50, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Berge Stahl owned by Bergesen d.y. or the BW group? I want to know because I changed it from Bergesen d.y. to the BW Group. If Bergesen d.y. still operates as a subsidiary of the BW group please change it for me. Thanks! class="autosigned">—Preceding 24.22.115.31 (talk) 03:44, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 8:43 pacific time 6 October 2008unsigned comment added by 24.22.115.31 (talk) 01:31, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Satelite Imagery

http://www.terraserver.com/view.asp?cx=576252&cy=5757904&proj=32631&mpp=0.75&pic=img&prov=gx19&stac=2753&ovrl=-1&drwl=-1

I have no way of measuring her to be sure, but I believe that this is the Berge Stahl in the port of Rotterdam on the 1st of April 2004. It looks like her and she's the largest ship in the area. Can anyone confirm to me whether or not that's actually her?--165.84.1.71 (talk) 23:00, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Scrapped?

The original word from Berge Bulk seemingly was that she was to be scrapped, but this has apparently not happened as she has been continuing to operate throughout 2017. The current last position received was from the 30th of November 2017 and puts her on a course from Brazil to Sohar, Oman, indicating that's she's still carrying iron ore nearly a year after her supposed retirement. http://www.bergebulk.com/our-fleet/berge-stahl/ Furthermore the Berge Bulk website now says this, "After 30 years, the legend performed her last voyage to Rotterdam in the second half of 2016. She was then headed for dry dock, where she was refitted before commencing her new contract," with new contract apparently meaning that she's been put on to different route rather than scrapped, at least for the meantime.--101.98.222.59 (talk) 13:39, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MS Berge Stahl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725205016/http://www.capeports.co.za/files/PP%2020061227.pdf to http://www.capeports.co.za/files/PP%2020061227.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"A trip from Brazil to The Netherlands"

I've removed this entire section was it was unsourced and IMHO consisted of WP:Original Research, Thanks. –Davey2010^Talk 20:44, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]