Talk:MLS Reserve League

2011 MLS Reserve Division was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 05 March 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into MLS Reserve League. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Football: American & Canadian Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).

this includes the articles

2007 Reserve Division Runners-up: Chivas USA or New England?

I understand that the Official MLS Site have listed Chivas USA ahead of New England in the final standings of 2007 Reserve Division. However why is that so? As they never met each other during the season (thus no head-to-head records), shouldn't GD be the tie-breaker (in which case New England's +6 would beat Chivas' +2)? This is also discussed on BigSoccer, which explored the possibility of PPG coming into play here. Are there any other reasons?

Rosters

Should Reserve League game rosters be noted? --Coppercanuck (talk) 01:31, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll ask it again. Now that MLS Reserves and USL Pro are playing meaningful, should the rosters be noted? --Coppercanuck (talk) 02:41, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MLS Reserve League. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140323213922/http://www.mlssoccer.com/2014-reserve-league-standings to http://www.mlssoccer.com/2014-reserve-league-standings

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]