Jump to content

Talk:M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:M19 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cerebellum (talk · contribs) 01:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! I will be reviewing this article. --Cerebellum (talk) 01:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • No issues with the image.
  • External links good; the DAB links tool isn't working.
  • The M19 MGMC had specifications to the M24 Chaffee. - Do you mean similar specifications? Done
  • The M19 was developed from the T65 which was based on the M5 light tank chassis; initially as the T65E1 Multiple Gun Motor Carriage. - This confused me, do you mean that the original name for the M19 was the T65E1? Consider rephrasing. Done
  • a production of 1,000 had been requested - 1,000 of what? The T65? Done
  • I'd like to see more information on the Korean War service history. Here is a source mentioning use in the Pusan Perimeter.
  • The bibliography says the Gander book was published in 2013, but you reference Gander 2010. Is this the same book? Same story with Green 2000/2014, and I don't know what Chamberlain & Ellis is.  Done

Looks pretty good, I'll just put this on hold until we fix the above issues! --Cerebellum (talk) 00:45, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making those correction so quickly! Pass. (Just so you know, though, I won't be able to finish the M21 Mortar Motor Carriage review until next weekend, sorry about that.) --Cerebellum (talk) 20:18, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copperhead

[edit]
  • Just came across some brit 1945 paper work naming this the Copperhead, new one on me.

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:M40 Gun Motor Carriage which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 22:49, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]