Talk:Müggelsee

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lakes Low‑importance

	Lakes portal Müggelsee is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 23 August 2021 and 10 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): EricDart. Peer reviewers: Klikata, BenBri.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was restore the title "Müggelsee", per the discussion below. I understand the objection to the lack of certainty here, but that is no reason to default to the new title, which is not supported by consensus. Feel free to nominate for deletion whichever articles you wish. Dekimasu よ! 00:41, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Müggelsee is the common english name. google scholar hits:

"Müggelsee water": 537 [1]

"lake-Müggel water": 9 [2], one of which is for "Lake Müggel- see". Yaan (talk) 19:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. "Müggel-lake water": 3 [3] Yaan (talk) 16:28, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

support: common English name. Yaan (talk) 12:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that "Lake Müggel" rarely seems to be used in English, and that the article should be moved to the prior title. Olessi (talk) 03:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The relevant question, however, is whether it is "Müggel" or "Müggelsee" in English. The "Lake" is a conventional identifier, just as most "River" articles as well.

Another important question, in any case, no matter where the article's name ends up, is why this is hidden away with Müggel and Muggel and Muggelsee and Lake Muggel all redlinks. Gene Nygaard (talk) 15:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose. Any such request is premature, as long as the article remains unreferenced. Gene Nygaard (talk) 14:44, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

better now? Sorry for all the references being in german, OTOH at least igb and the förderverein seem pretty authorative. Yaan (talk) 16:59, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better for purposes of the "unreferenced" tag. But nothing particularly relevant to the requested move. Let's have something about who uses Müggelsee in English, who uses Muggelsee or Mueggelsee,, who uses "Lake Müggel" or "Müggel Lake" or "Lake Muggel" or "Muggel Lake" or "Lake Mueggel" or "Mueggel Lake", who uses "Müggel" alone in English and whether or not the "Lake" part of the articles name is merely a conventional usage for this class of article. We also see "Lake Müggelsee" in English. Is there reason enough in English usage to claim that a move is reasoable? Gene Nygaard (talk) 14:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support: "Lake Müggel" seems to exist mainly in Wikipedia. -- User:Docu

Additional comments

Any comparison of usage needs to consider "Müggel Lake" as well as "Lake Müggel". They should be considered equivalents in any comparison of usage between "Müggelsee" and "Müggel". The choice of what comes first is simply a matter of only one slot being available for the article's name, and Id guess that the choice was made in part based on the way similar articles are named. Gene Nygaard (talk) 15:11, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If nobody cares about all those redlinks above, if it isn't important enough for anyone to worry about whether or not our readers can find it, I'd say the appropriate solution is probably not a move of the article, but rather just send it to WP:AfD. Gene Nygaard (talk) 14:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Müggelsee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review is done Klikata (talk) 21:30, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]