Talk:M&D's

Amusement Parks: Roller Coasters Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

The article is more discriptive, I do not believe it is an advertisement. Craigster92 (talk) 11:16, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents section

I don't want to come across as if I am defending this park but all the incidents listed except the derailment appear to be due to either high winds or the safety systems themselves stopping the roller coasters. Because of this I don't think they are notable and am tempted to remove them as roller coasters stop all the time, everywhere. Stops are to protect riders, not put them in danger. I am tempted to remove all the incidents except the derailment, as an entire train falling to pieces and derailing is not normal.

Does anybody object?

NemesisAT (talk) 20:29, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents due to high winds are still incidents - if a ride is not safe in high winds it shouldn't be operating during them. Safety systems kicking in, though, seems like normal (and desirable) occurrence, so I would agree that any that were just inconvenient and not injury-causing could be removed. However, this article is written more like an advertisement for the park than an encyclopedia article. If the rest of the park history was in the article, rather than just descriptions of rides which could be obtained from the park website, the negative incidents wouldn't stand out so much as dominating the text.—Anne Delong (talk) 15:18, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on M&D's. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Scotland’s theme park.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:21, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]